In a pivotal moment during the final session of the fourth Test between India and Australia at the Melbourne Cricket Ground (MCG), Indian opener Yashasvi Jaiswal was controversially dismissed, igniting widespread debate among cricket enthusiasts.
Facing a short delivery from Australian captain Pat Cummins, Jaiswal attempted a pull shot but appeared to miss the ball, which was collected by wicketkeeper Alex Carey. Umpire Joel Wilson initially adjudged Jaiswal not out. However, Cummins promptly called for a review, confident of a faint edge.
No spike on Snicko, but declared out
Upon review, third umpire Sharfuddoula Ibne Shahid Saikat observed a deflection as the ball passed Jaiswal’s bat and gloves. Notably, the Snickometer (Snicko) technology, designed to detect audio spikes indicating contact, displayed a flat line, suggesting no edge. Despite the absence of a spike on Snicko, Saikat concluded that the visual evidence of the deflection was sufficient to overturn the on-field decision, declaring Jaiswal out caught behind.
Resilient 84 run by Jaiswal
Jaiswal, who had been anchoring India’s innings with a resilient 84, was visibly displeased with the decision. He engaged in a brief exchange with the on-field umpires before reluctantly departing the field. The dismissal left India in a precarious position, with the scoreboard reading 140 for 7 in pursuit of a 340-run target.
The incident has sparked significant discussion regarding the reliability and interpretation of technological aids in cricket. Warren Brennan, whose company operates Snicko, explained that certain shots, like Jaiswal’s attempted pull, may not produce detectable noise, resulting in a flat line on Snicko. He noted, “That was one of the glance-shots where there isn’t any noise so Snicko shows nothing only ambient noise.”
Former Test umpire Simon Taufel supported the third umpire’s decision
Former Test umpire Simon Taufel supported the third umpire’s decision, stating that clear visual evidence of a deflection can be deemed conclusive, even in the absence of corroborating audio from Snicko. Taufel remarked, “The third umpire did make the correct decision in the end… The clear deflection is conclusive evidence.”
This episode underscores the complexities and challenges of integrating technology into cricket officiating. While tools like Snicko and Hot Spot enhance decision-making accuracy, they are not infallible. The incident has reignited discussions about the protocols for using technological evidence, especially when different tools provide conflicting information.
As the series progresses, the cricketing community will closely monitor how such situations are managed, emphasizing the need for clear guidelines to ensure fair play and maintain the integrity of the sport.
See video footage:
Discover more from TIMES OF BIHAR
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
